In the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed the lives of 28 civilians, the Indian government has announced the suspension of the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) — a significant and historic step in response to repeated cross-border aggression. The move marks a decisive moment in India’s diplomatic strategy, signaling a tougher stance on Pakistan amid escalating tensions.
Background: The Pahalgam Attack
On April 22, 2025, militants launched a coordinated attack in Pahalgam, a popular tourist destination in Jammu and Kashmir which resulted in killing of 28 civilians and 20 injured. The attack, which targeted civilians specially Hindus. Indian intelligence agencies quickly pointed to Pakistan-based terror groups as the masterminds, echoing a pattern seen in earlier incidents such as the Pulwama and Uri attacks.
The government’s response was swift and assertive — including the suspension of bilateral water cooperation under the Indus Water Treaty, a cornerstone of Indo-Pak relations since 1960.
What is the Indus Water Treaty?
Signed in 1960 with World Bank mediation, the Indus Water Treaty divided the six rivers of the Indus Basin between India and Pakistan:
India received control over the eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej.
Pakistan was granted rights to the western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab.
India retained limited rights to use the western rivers for irrigation and hydroelectric power, without obstructing flow.
The treaty has withstood several wars and decades of hostilities, widely seen as a rare example of consistent cooperation between the two nuclear-armed neighbors.
India’s Reason for Suspension
India’s decision to suspend the IWT stems from mounting frustration with Pakistan’s inaction against terror groups operating within its borders. The Pahalgam attack, one of the deadliest in the region after the revocation of the 370 special status of Jammu and Kashmir, targeted civilians and was reportedly aimed at resisting demographic changes in the Kashmir Valley.
Indian officials argue that Pakistan cannot expect cooperation in areas like water sharing while allowing terrorism to flourish. By suspending the treaty, India aims to exert strategic pressure without immediate military escalation.
Diplomatic and Legal Ramifications
While India has not officially abrogated the treaty, the suspension of data exchange, cooperation under the Indus Commission, and the halting of meetings signal a serious shift. Legal experts suggest this could be a precursor to renegotiation or withdrawal, although that process would involve complex international legal implications, especially with the World Bank as a guarantor.
This suspension also sends a message to the international community — particularly allies and neutral observers — that India is willing to reconsider long-standing agreements when national security is compromised.
Impact on Pakistan
For Pakistan, the implications are serious. Over 80% of its irrigation network relies on the Indus and its tributaries. Any disruption to water flow could have dire consequences for agriculture, energy, and food security. The move also exposes Islamabad diplomatically, as it continues to face pressure to curb terror activities within its borders.
Pakistan has appealed to the World Bank and United Nations, accusing India of weaponizing water and violating the spirit of the treaty. However, global sympathy appears tilted toward India, given the repeated nature of terror attacks and the country’s restrained responses thus far.
What Lies Ahead?
The coming weeks are critical. India is expected to review its hydroelectric projects on western rivers, including long-stalled plans for dams and storage facilities. This could mark the beginning of a hydro-strategic shift that affects Pakistan’s downstream water availability.
At the same time, there is growing debate within India about permanently altering or exiting the treaty, especially as water becomes a strategic resource amid climate change and population growth.
Geopolitical Implications
India’s decision could redefine South Asian hydro-politics. China, too, holds upstream power over rivers flowing into India’s northeast. If treaties like the IWT begin to falter, it could set a precedent for similar stances across the region.
The suspension may also influence global discussions on transboundary water agreements, many of which are already under strain due to changing climate patterns and increasing nationalism.
Conclusion
The suspension of the Indus Water Treaty by India after the Pahalgam terror attack is not merely a policy shift — it’s a strategic recalibration. It underscores how water security and national security are now deeply intertwined. While the situation is fluid, one thing is clear: the future of Indo-Pak relations may now be shaped as much by rivers as by rhetoric.
Read more news here.
Read more interesting blog here.